I have regrets delving into potentially politically topics, but then again, I have had posts about libertarianism and extreme ideologies before, so I’ll give it another attempt. My regret is that it’s so easy to bitch about hot-button topics.
I follow a “news” site that sort of straddles the line between hard-right and anarchistic. I think it’s a good idea to at least read opposing viewpoints, despite how much it might piss you off or baffle you. This site could be considered a news aggregator, although they do have some original authors on there. A lot of times, what you get is an opinion piece with quotes from news articles. And this one was no different.
Typically, the postings on this site are using news articles and other sources to promote their ideology, which is free-market capitalism and very anti-government – essentially extreme libertarianism. This particular article I found was on health care costs and how it is cheaper to go to Mexico for surgery, on the order of ten times cheaper.
Naturally, the article invokes the trigger word, “socialism” as in “socialized healthcare” and their applied synonym, “ObamaCare”. The belief is that if we stop the subsidies, the prices will come down to reasonable levels. And to bolster that argument, the article compares a $30k procedure in the US to the same procedure in Mexico, which cost $3k.
Let’s pause for a moment here and realize there are quite a few Americans who do not have $3,000 readily available for an emergency.
Now, let’s also consider that the exchange rate. Today, $1 is nearly 19 pesos. Another potential cost of living metric is that bread in the US costs $1.40, which in Mexico it costs 15 pesos. So then, sure, things in Mexico are typically ten times less expensive and our American dollars get us much more in Mexico. So, you could just as easily have a Mexican version of this article wondering why a medical procedure costs 57,000 pesos.
So, let’s play along and embrace the libertarian dream. Now, there is no insurance and health care is a cash-only option. Because the health industry can’t exploit insurance, prices drop to $3,000 for a particular procedure. So, who’s going to have trouble paying for this? Hint: It’s the same ones that couldn’t pay $3,000 before.
As usual, this just reinforces the standard position of not caring about anyone but yourself.
Holding On
I read a recent post by AK that flew right in the face of a hobby I’ve been cultivating. It’s something I’ve been doing for a little while and is really only one facet of the other side of the Letting Go story. The hobby (and obsession for some) is “archival”.
First, I’m no stranger to purges and I feel the same satisfaction from downsizing as anyone with too much stuff would. However, sometimes, regret comes back to haunt me. It’s not the loss of a blender or a stack of towels that I miss. It’s usually something less utility and more historically significant, which usually carries some emotion with it. When I say historically significant, I don’t mean like a piece of the Berlin wall, I mean something that represents a period of your life. And even though there is emotion and significance behind it, there is also a strong element of uselessness.
I ‘ve read a little on the KonMari method and internally nodded my head up until I got to the point where it was explained that we hold on to things for two main reasons: the future and the past. In the case of the future, we don’t want to get rid of something because we may have a future use for it. That’s a rational argument, but I usually tackle that by reminding myself that when I need it in the future, I can buy the latest and greatest version of what I need. (Ironically, the latest version of most things will probably be made shoddier and overall be worse in quality, so…) That kind of mindset would make older generations freak out. How wasteful!
In the case of the past, which is where my archivist neuroses kick in, you are afraid of losing a bit of your identity. The modern philosophy is to live in the present, which, expressed in outrageous terms, is hedonistic. If you disregard your past and do not plan your future, what is life? A day-to-day experience with no permanence.
And, many would agree, the past is highly important, on a personal and societal level. I’m not going to go to the levels of psychoarchivists who want to preserve absolutely everything, but I do believe that you need to have a record of your past in more than simple digital records.
I have a box in which I keep all my ephemera. I have items going back to my teenage years, which I believe are personally socially significant. One of the most useless things I have is a rubber hand with formable fingers. Yes, at the time, it was usually used to flip people off and it has literally zero value today, but it’s a part of my past and is a useful prop when sharing my life story with someone. Everybody loves props.
I have an old horoscope paper which used to be sold in little plastic tubes back in the day. I have memorabilia from past jobs – old name tags, signs, magnets. You could find some of these things in thrift shops and consignment stores and that is where the great disconnect happens. People think these things have value. They only have value to the person who acquired them. You can’t buy a memory from a store. I would never try to replace anything from my memory box from a store. Like a child’s replacement teddy bear, it’s not the same.
So back to the KonMari method. You might surmise that I would keep everything in my memory box because it gave me joy. That’s not entirely true. It rekindles a memory. And more importantly, the loss of not having those items is greater than the cost of keeping them. There is a time in a friendship where you finally feel comfortable baring yourself for another person, and that is when the memory box comes out and is shared. To not have a physical record of your personal highs and lows would be a shame. You can flash all the photos and videos on the screen that you want, but to be able to touch someone’s past is unique and special.